February 18, 2021
Summaries of independently published NeuroTracker studies investigating assessment of human performance.
This study aimed to investigate if real-time Neurofeedback can enhance learning rates for NeuroTracker training.
40 healthy adults were assigned to four training groups (ten each), performing either: standard NeuroTracker training, no training (control group), NeuroTracker with EEG-Neurofeedback, or NeuroTracker with sham Neurofeedback. EEG-Neurofeedback involved closed-loop feedback that automatically detects when a participant has lost track of their targets and immediately reindexes them.
The standard NeuroTracker group, control group and EEG-Neurofeedback groups started at a similar level, higher than the sham Neurofeedback group. However the EEG-Neurofeedback showed superior learning rates over all other groups over the course of 10 training sessions.
The results show that a closed-loop learning paradigm is highly effective at enhancing learning outcomes on the NeuroTracker task.
Reference: Brendan Parsons & Jocelyn Faubert ‘Enhancing learning in a perceptual-cognitive training paradigm using EEG-neurofeedback’ Scientific Reports 11, 2021.
Looking for more information on NeuroTracker research? Feel free to contact us.
latests news from us
Summaries of independently published NeuroTracker studies investigating assessment of human performance.
*Elite athletes and skilled specialists from teams and organizations like these. All trademarks and logos are intellectual property and owned by the respective organizations listed, not NeuroTracker.*
** NeuroTracker is used in various peer reviewed medical research and applications under the guidance of a licensed medical professional. NeuroTracker is not intended to be substituted for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.